WEN Xuemei;WU Xuanfei;

• 1:School of Public Administration
• 2: Southwest Jiaotong University

Abstract：

The reform of governmental substantive coordination organizations, designed to enhance collaborative efficacy, paradoxically succumbs to functional alienation. Through a five-year longitudinal study of Urban-Rural Community Development and Governance Committee in City A, this research systematically reveals the dynamic adaptation logic and alienation mechanisms of governmental substantive coordination organizations. Findings indicate that the organization achieved phased activation of coordination functions via four-dimensional adaptive strategies: restructuring power hierarchies, aligning bureaucratic rules, innovating resource allocation and integrating performance consensus. However, when interacting with the bureaucratic system, these strategic adaptations manifest alienating tendencies: attenuation of authority transmission, ambiguity traps in responsibility reconfiguration, hierarchical barriers to resource integration and structural bias in performance incentives. These phenomena fundamentally represent the bureaucratic system's systemic exclusion of organizational innovations through its entrenched structural power. This research illuminates the inherent tension between structural inertia and organizational innovation within administrative reforms, offering critical insights for contemporary governmental institutional restructuring.

Key Words： government entity-type coordination organizations;functional alienation;bureaucratic exclusion;organizational adaptation;structural inertia

Abstract:

Keywords:

Foundation: 2021年度国家社会科学基金青年项目“社会网络视角下区域基本医疗卫生服务协调发展策略研究”(项目批准号:21CGL048)的资助

Authors: WEN Xuemei;WU Xuanfei;

References：

• 陈家建.2013.项目制与基层政府动员——对社会管理项目化运作的社会学考察[J].中国社会科学，(2):64-79.Chen J J.2013.The project system and the mobilization of grass-roots government officials:A sociological study of the project-oriented operation of social management[J].Social Sciences in China,(2):64-79.(in Chinese) 陈家建，甘瑞霖.2021.县域治理中的协调型部门——对D县发改局的个案研究[J].社会科学研究，(2):39-48.Chen J J,Gan R L.2021.Coordinating department in county governance—A case study of D county development and reform bureau[J].Social Science Research,(2):39-48.(in Chinese) 风笑天.2022.个案的力量：论个案研究的方法论意义及其应用[J].社会科学，(5):140-149.Feng X T.2022.The power of cases:On the methodological significance of case studies and their application[J].Journal of Social Sciences,(5):140-149.(in Chinese) 胡业飞.2018.组织内协调机制选择与议事协调机构生存逻辑——一个组织理论的解释[J].公共管理学报，15(3):27-38.Hu Y F.2018.Choice of coordinating mechanism within organization and the law of survival of deliberative and coordinating agencies—An explanation from organizational theory[J].Journal of Public Management,15(3):27-38.(in Chinese) 赖静萍.2014.当代中国领导小组类型的扩展与现代国家成长[J].中共党史研究，(10):49-59.Lai J P.2014.The expansion of leading group types and the growth of modern state in contemporary China[J].CPC History Studies,(10):49-59.(in Chinese) 练宏.2016.注意力竞争——基于参与观察与多案例的组织学分析[J].社会学研究，31(4):1-26.Lian H.2016.Constructing the Chinese governance system:History and reality competing for attention in the Chinese bureaucracy[J].Sociological Studies,31(4):1-26.(in Chinese) 刘军强，谢延会.2015.非常规任务、官员注意力与中国地方议事协调小组治理机制——基于A省A市的研究(2002～2012)[J].政治学研究，(4):84-97.Liu J Q,Xie Y H.2015.Non-conventional tasks,attention allocation and the leading small group mechanism in Chinese local government:A case study of A city in A province (2002～2012)[J].Journal of Political Science,(4):84-97.(in Chinese) 刘柯，谢新水.2023.工作专班：应对临时性任务的政府组织形式创新[J].中国行政管理，39(4):63-70.Liu K,Xie X S.2023.Special work team:Innovation of government organization form in response to temporary tasks[J].Chinese Public Administration,39(4):63-70.(in Chinese) 田先红.2022.中国基层治理：体制与机制——条块关系的分析视角[J].公共管理与政策评论，11(1):43-54.Tian X H.2022.Grassroots governance in China:Institutions and mechanisms—Analysis perspective of the Tiao-Kuai Relation[J].Public Administration and Policy Review,11(1):43-54.(in Chinese) 王富伟.2012.个案研究的意义和限度——基于知识的增长[J].社会学研究，27(5):161-183.Wang F W.2012.The significance and limitation of case study:Based on the perspective of knowledge growth[J].Sociological Studies,27(5):161-183.(in Chinese) 王心怡，孟天广.2024.重访科层制：对议事协调机制的类型学探究[J].西安交通大学学报(社会科学版),44(1):74-86.Wang X Y,Meng T G.2024.Revisiting the bureaucracy:A typological study of the multi-departmental coordination mechanism[J].Journal of Xi'an Jiaotong University (Social Sciences),44(1):74-86.(in Chinese) 吴晓林.2009.“小组政治”研究：内涵、功能与研究展望[J].求实，(3):64-69.Wu X L.2009.The study of “Small Groups Politics”:Connotation,function and research prospects[J].Truth Seeking,(3):64-69.(in Chinese) 杨宏山，赵远跃.2023.权威引领与行动赋能：城市跨界治理的整合机制——基于北京城市基层治理的案例考察[J].云南行政学院学报，25(5):41-50.Yang H S,Zhao Y Y.2023.Authoritative guidance and action empowerment:An integrated mechanism for urban cross-boundary governance:Based on the case study of urban grass-roots governance in Beijing[J].The Journal of Yunnan Administration College,25(5):41-50.(in Chinese) 叶托.2015.国务院议事协调机构的变迁及其逻辑[J].中国行政管理，(12):28-33.Ye T.2015.Lock in the downsizing-expanding circle:Vicissitude and its logic of coordination agencies in the state council[J].Chinese Public Administration,(12):28-33.(in Chinese) 原超.2019.理解“议事协调小组”:中国特色政策执行的实践工具[J].领导科学论坛，(15):36-48.Yuan C.2019.The consultative group:A practical tool for policy implementation with Chinese characteristics[J].The Forum of Leadership Science,(15):36-48.(in Chinese) 原超，李妮.2017.地方领导小组的运作逻辑及对政府治理的影响——基于组织激励视角的分析[J].公共管理学报，14(1):27-37.Yuan C,Li N.2017.The operation logic of local leading groups and influence on local governance:An analysis based on the view of organizational incentives[J].Journal of Public Management,14(1):27-37.(in Chinese) 钟开斌.2018.中国应急管理机构的演进与发展：基于协调视角的观察[J].公共管理与政策评论，7(6):21-36.Zhong K B.2018.The evolution and development of the emergency management organizational structure in China:From the perspective of coordination[J].Public Administration and Policy Review,7(6):21-36.(in Chinese) 周望.2010.中国“小组”政治组织模式分析[J].南京社会科学，(2):77-81,88.Zhou W.2010.An analysis of political organizational model of “small groups” in China[J].Nanjing Journal of Social Sciences,(2):77-81,88.(in Chinese) 周望.2015.“领导小组”如何领导?——对“中央领导小组”的一项整体性分析[J].理论与改革，(1):95-99.Zhou W.2015.How “leading small groups” to lead?An overall analysis of the central leading small groups of CPC[J].Theory and Reform,(1):95-99.(in Chinese) 周望.2019.大国治理中的领导小组：一项治理机制的演化与精化[J].中共天津市委党校学报，21(5):48-55.Zhou W.2019.Leading small group in Chinese governance:A governance mechanism's continuation and modernization[J].Journal of the Party School of Tianjin Committee of the CPC,21(5):48-55.(in Chinese) 朱光磊，张志红.2005.“职责同构”批判[J].北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版),42(1):101-112.Zhu G L,Zhang Z H.2005.A critique of “isomorphic responsibility” governmental system[J].Journal of Peking University (Philosophy and Social Sciences),42(1):101-112.(in Chinese) Bourdieu P,Wacquant L J D.1992.An invitation to reflexive sociology[M].Chicago:University of Chicago Press. Shambaugh D.2007.China's propaganda system:Institutions,processes and efficacy[J].The China Journal,57:25-58.
• (1)编码规则为访谈日期(年月日)+受访者代码。例如,编号20230421WZR即表示该访谈于2023年4月21 日进行,受访者为WZR。 (1)罗伯特·默顿(Robert K.Merton)在1949年发表的论文《社会学功能的范式》中系统阐述了功能异化理论(Theory of Dysfunctional Consequences,或称“反功能”理论),是其结构功能主义思想的核心组成部分,旨在批判帕森斯的传统功能主义对“社会现象必然具有正向功能”的预设,强调社会结构或制度可能产生与初衷相悖的意外后果。本文引入该理论,以期帮助解释协调型组织运作的复杂逻辑。 (2)2017年中共中央、国务院《关于加强和完善城乡社区治理的意见》明确提出:“完善中央层面城乡社区治理工作协调机制,地方各级党委和政府要建立健全相应工作机制,抓好统筹指导、组织协调、资源整合和督促检查。”2021年中共中央、国务院《关于加强基层治理体系和治理能力现代化建设的意见》提出:“各级党委和政府要加强对基层治理的组织领导,完善议事协调机制,强化统筹协调。” (3)该数据来源于C市社治委年度财政预算。 (4)政府内部文件:《C市党建引领小区治理——乡村集中居住区示范建设指标》。A市党建引领社区治理示范社区的建设是在C市的要求下展开的试点,验收指标也由C市确定。