Steadying Expectations and Guiding Direction: The Thematic Evolution and Interagency Networks in China's Policy Briefings
LING Jiaheng;WENG Zongyuan;LIU Lun;
Abstract:
In a context of rising uncertainties, management of policy expectations has become a central task in state governance. This study examines the State Council's regular policy briefings as an important instrument for communicating policy expectations in China. Policy briefings are organized events at which senior officials explain major policies, respond to questions from domestic and foreign media, and provide information about future policy direction. They are designed to reduce policy ambiguities, narrow information and expectation asymmetries, and compensate for a decision-making process that often compresses formal deliberations and shifts some of the coordination to the implementation stage. This analysis, using the full transcripts of 365 regular policy briefings held between 2015 and 2023, builds an integrated research framework that combines text and network analysis. First, it applies neural topic modeling and class-based TF-IDF methods to identify the main themes in each briefing and to construct topic representations over time. Second, it uses a semantic matching procedure based on a Chinese Sentence BERT model to measure how strongly each briefing relates to four key governance relationships, namely center-local, government-business, government-citizen, and domestic-international relations. A dynamic topic analysis and a simple smoothing of the time series are then used to trace how the salience of themes and relationship scores change across different policy cycles and social contexts. Third, a social network analysis of co-participation is conducted to map the structure of interagency collaboration, whereby the nodes represent ministries, commissions, and other organizations, and the links are weighted by the number of joint appearances in the same briefing. The empirical results show that the relative salience of the four governance relationships varies over time. Center-local relations remain highly salient throughout the period and reach local peaks around the time of the launch and implementation of successive five-year plans, suggesting that policy briefings play an important role in vertical coordination. Government-business communications are strong during the early years and thereafter on average decline, though they still rise during specific reform periods related to the business environment. Government-citizen communications became more prominent during the COVID-19 period, especially when public health measures and social protection policies faced frequent adjustments. Domestic-international relations are less salient on average, reflecting the predominantly domestic orientation of the policy briefings. The analysis of keywords and media questions shows that briefings consistently highlight issues related to market actors and the business environment, science and technology innovation, industrial development, risk prevention, and social security, while also responding to short-term concerns. The study of media participation indicates a clear hierarchical division among domestic outlets, with central state media focusing on macroeconomic and core livelihood issues and specialized outlets covering their professional fields. This reveals a regional and functional differentiation among foreign outlets. The network of interagency cooperation displays a small-world pattern with a high clustering coefficient, whereby core economic agencies, such as the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Finance, the Ministry of Commerce, and the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, occupy central and bridging positions, while the line ministries with specialized mandates tend to cooperate repeatedly with a smaller set of partners. Overall, the study conceptualizes the State Council policy briefings as a useful instrument for managing policy expectations in China, extends the focus of expected communication research beyond monetary and fiscal policy to a broader range of policy domains and government actors, and documents how the briefing agendas, the media channels, and interagency cooperation combine to guide expectations in a setting of increasing uncertainty.
Key Words: policy briefing;policy expectations;expected communication;topic modeling;interagency cooperation
Foundation:
Authors: LING Jiaheng;WENG Zongyuan;LIU Lun;
References:
- 陈良源,林建浩.2024.货币政策预期管理的策略选择:模糊沟通与精确沟通[J].管理世界,40(12):63-78,94.Chen L Y,Lin J H.2024.The strategic choice of monetary policy expectation management:Ambiguous or precise communication[J].Journal of Management World,40(12):63-78,94.(in Chinese) 陈雨恬,杨子晖,温雪莲.2024.预期引导、经济韧性与宏观经济治理[J].管理世界,40(11):66-84.Chen Y T,Yang Z H,Wen X L.2024.Expectation guidance,economic resilience and macroeconomic governance[J].Journal of Management World,40(11):66-84.(in Chinese) 杜其君.2023.政策细化:一种政策适应性的再生产方式[J].公共管理评论,5(1):25-44.Du Q J.2023.Policy refinement:A mode to reproduce policy adaptability[J].China Public Administration Review,5(1):25-44.(in Chinese) 郭豫媚,陈伟泽,陈彦斌.2016.中国货币政策有效性下降与预期管理研究[J].经济研究,51(1):28-41,83.Guo Y M,Chen W Z,Chen Y B.2016.The decreasing effectiveness of China's monetary policy and expectation management[J].Economic Research Journal,51(1):28-41,83.(in Chinese) 郭豫媚,陈彦斌.2017.预期管理的政策实践与改进措施[J].中国人民大学学报,31(5):60-67.Guo Y M,Chen Y B.2017.The policy practice and improvement measures of expectation management[J].Journal of the Renmin University of China,31(5):60-67.(in Chinese) 郭玉清,何杨,李龙.2016.救助预期、公共池激励与地方政府举债融资的大国治理[J].经济研究,51(3):81-95.Guo Y Q,He Y,Li L.2016.Bailout expectation,common pool incentive and governance of China's local government debt financing[J].Economic Research Journal,51(3):81-95.(in Chinese) 郭施宏,谭欣.2025.政府借助专家发声更有效吗?——一项自然灾害的调查实验[J].公共管理评论,7 (1):246-268.Guo S H,Tan X.2025.Are Government Communications More Effective with Expert Involvement?An Experimental Study Based on a Natural Disaster[J].China Public Administration Review,7(1):246-268.(in Chinese) 何艳玲.2018.理顺关系与国家治理结构的塑造[J].中国社会科学,(2):26-47.He Y L.2018.The reordering of relations and the formation of a national governance structure[J].Social Sciences in China,(2):26-47.(in Chinese) 廖福崇.2021.“放管服”改革过程中畅通政企沟通渠道的实证研究[J].中南大学学报(社会科学版),27(2):183-191.Liao F C.2021.An empirical study on smoothening government-enterprise interaction channel in China's administrative reform[J].Journal of Central South University (Social Sciences),27(2):183-191.(in Chinese) 刘金全,刘文轩.2023.央行沟通与经济不确定性预期管理——基于大数据文本分析的研究[J].中央财经大学学报,(8):31-41.Liu J Q,Liu W X.2023.Central bank communication and economic uncertainty expectation management:Based on index construction of big data text analysis[J].Journal of Central University of Finance & Economics,(8):31-41.(in Chinese) 刘志远,王存峰,彭涛,等.2017.政策不确定性与企业风险承担:机遇预期效应还是损失规避效应[J].南开管理评论,20(6):15-27.Liu Z Y,Wang C F,Peng T,et al.2017.Economic policy uncertainty and corporate risk taking:Opportunities seeking or loss aversion?[J].Nankai Business Review,20(6):15-27.(in Chinese) 庞明礼,薛金刚.2017.政策模糊与治理绩效:基于对政府间分权化改革的观察[J].中国行政管理,(10):120-125.Pang M L,Xue J G.2017.Policy ambiguity and governance performance:Based on the observation of intergovernmental decentralization reform[J].Chinese Public Administration,(10):120-125.(in Chinese) 桑玉成.2006.政策预期与政策认同及其对于社会公正的意义[J].吉林大学社会科学学报,46(4):32-37.Sang Y C.2006.Policy expectation,policy recognization and their significance to social justice[J].Jilin University Journal Social Sciences Edition,46(4):32-37.(in Chinese) 薛澜,赵静.2017.转型期公共政策过程的适应性改革及局限 [J].中国社会科学,(9):45-67,206.Xue L,Zhao J.2017.An exploration of the type matching and application of policy mechanisms[J].Social Sciences in China,(09):45-67,206.(in Chinese) 杨艳,易伟.2024.货币政策预期管理的宏观经济效应:兼论流动性监管的作用[J].经济理论与经济管理,44(7):103-118.Yang Y,Yi W.2024.The macroeconomic effects of monetary policy expectations management:Annotation of the role of liquidity regulation[J].Economic Theory and Business Management,44(7):103-118.(in Chinese) 赵静,薛澜.2021.探究政策机制的类型匹配与运用[J].中国社会科学,(10):39-60,205.Zhao J,Xue L.2021.An exploration of the type matching and application of policy mechanisms[J].Social Sciences in China,(10):39-60,205.(in Chinese) 赵茜.2020.外部经济政策不确定性、投资者预期与股市跨境资金流动[J].世界经济,43(5):145-169.Zhao Q.2020.External economic policy uncertainty,investor expectations and cross-border capital flows in the stock market[J].The Journal of World Economy,43(5):145-169.(in Chinese) 赵泽斌,李映洁,生世玉,等.2024.区域碳减排政策协同的演化轨迹与影响因素——基于网络分析视角[J].公共管理与政策评论,13(6):20-33.Zhao Z B,Li Y J,Sheng S Y,et al.2024.Evolutionary trajectory and influencing factors of regional carbon emission reduction policy collaboration:Based on network analysis perspective[J].Public Administration and Policy Review,13(6):20-33.(in Chinese) 钟春平,田敏.2015.预期、有偏性预期及其形成机制:宏观经济学的进展与争议[J].经济研究,50(5):162-177.Zhong C P,Tian M.2015.Expectation,biased expectation,and its mechanism:Macroeconomics' progress and debates[J].Economic Research Journal,50(5):162-177.(in Chinese) 朱亚鹏,张丽霞.2024.预期治理:公共管理研究的新视角[J].中国行政管理,40(8):45-55.Zhu Y P,Zhang L X.2024.Anticipatory governance:A new perspective of public management studies[J].Chinese Public Administration,40(8):45-55.(in Chinese) 庄子罐,崔小勇,龚六堂,等.2012.预期与经济波动——预期冲击是驱动中国经济波动的主要力量吗?[J].经济研究,47(6):46-59.Zhuang Z G,Cui X Y,Gong L T,et al.2012.Expectations and business cycle:Can news shocks be a major source of China's economic fluctuations?[J].Economic Research Journal,47(6):46-59.(in Chinese) Blinder A S,Ehrmann M,Fratzscher M,et al.2008.Central bank communication and monetary policy:A survey of theory and evidence[J].Journal of Economic Literature,46(4):910-945. Blondel V D,Guillaume J L,Lambiotte R,et al.2008.Fast unfolding of communities in large networks[J].Journal of Statistical Mechanics:Theory and Experiment,2008(10):P10008. Cyert R M,March J G.1963.A behavioral theory of the firm[M].Englewood Cliffs,NJ:Prentice-Hall. Das S,Kuhnen C M,Nagel S.2020.Socioeconomic status and macroeconomic expectations[J].The Review of Financial Studies,33(1):395-432. Leeper E M,Walker T B,Yang S C S.2013.Fiscal foresight and information flows[J].Econometrica,81(3):1115-1145. Morris S,Shin H S.2002.Social value of public information[J].American Economic Review,92(5):1521-1534. Muth J F.1961.Rational expectations and the theory of price movements[J].Econometrica,29(3):315-335. Newman M E J,Girvan M.2004.Finding and evaluating community structure in networks[J].Physical Review E,69(2):026113. Papadamou S.2013.Market anticipation of monetary policy actions and interest rate transmission to US Treasury market rates[J].Economic Modelling,33:545-551. Pigou A C.2016.Industrial fluctuations[M].London:Routledge. Plekhanov A,Singh R.2006.How should subnational government borrowing be regulated?Some cross-country empirical evidence[J].IMF Staff Papers,53(3):426-452. Ramey V A.2011.Identifying government spending shocks:It's all in the timing[J].The Quarterly Journal of Economics,126(1):1-50. Sargent T J,Fand D,Goldfeld S.1973.Rational expectations,the real rate of interest,and the natural rate of unemployment[J].Brookings Papers on Economic Activity,1973(2):429-480. Taylor J B.1975.Monetary policy during a transition to rational expectations[J].Journal of Political Economy,83(5):1009-1021. Wlezien C,Soroka S.2024.Media reflect! Policy,the public,and the news[J].American Political Science Review,118(3):1563-1569. Zhu X F,Wang Y.2025.Credible signaling to promote local compliance:Evidence from China's multiwave inspection of environmental protection[J].Public Administration,103(1):47-65.
- (1)乌卡时代(VUCA)是volatile(易变)、uncertain(不确定)、complex(复杂)、ambiguous(模糊)四个英文单词的首字母缩写,强调了易变性、不确定性、复杂性和模糊性交织的世界。 (2)中华人民共和国国务院新闻办公室:《国新办举行2014年国民经济社会发展等情况政策例行吹风会》,2015年1月16日,http://www.scio.gov.cn/gwyzclxcfh/cfh/2015n_13993/2015n01y16r/,2026年1月4日访问。 (3)具体细节因篇幅所限未予呈现,感兴趣的读者可与作者联系获取。 (4)例如,国务院新闻办公室在2018年就“优化营商环境”议题多次召开政策例行吹风会,包括9月27日的“优化口岸营商环境”吹风会及11月9日的“聚焦企业关切推动优化营商环境政策落实”吹风会,均涉及多个核心经济部门。 (5)例如,2017年2月7日国务院政策例行吹风会聚焦国家发展改革委、教育部等部门介绍2016年人大代表建议和政协委员提案办理情况,而同年4月18日外交部则专门就“一带一路”举行了中外媒体吹风会。 (6)例如,这与中国政府近年来发布的一系列旨在推动人工智能发展的国家级战略规划(如《新一代人工智能发展规划》)的政策导向一致。 (7)为节约篇幅,本文省略了对图4至图6的详细文字描述及其他年份的分析结果,感兴趣的读者可向作者索取。 (8)部分以阶段性工作总结、近期宏观形势解读为主,未直接指向具体待发布或新近发布政策文本的吹风会,因其难以精确匹配政策发布时间点,故未纳入本次响应时间区间的量化统计范畴,以确保分析的精准性。
- LING Jiaheng
- WENG Zongyuan
- LIU Lun
- School of Public Policy and Management
- Tsinghua University
- School of Government
- Peking University
- LING Jiaheng
- WENG Zongyuan
- LIU Lun
- School of Public Policy and Management
- Tsinghua University
- School of Government
- Peking University